The purpose of this blog is to be a resource for HR and labor relations professionals. It will give you an opportunity to become familiar with F&H Solutions Group, stay abreast of changes related to the human capital industry and develop a better understanding of the attitudes of employees and supervisors. Our blog posts are designed to be thought provoking, educational, and interactive. Things are changing very rapidly in this industry and we hope you can rely on us to be a source of information. We look forward to your comments and hope you find our content helpful. Please feel free to pass the blog link on to others who might be interested.

"UNCOVERING THE UNDERCOVER BOSS" - Episode 6, GSI Commerce

In this week’s episode, Michael Rubin, Founder and CEO of GSI Commerce, went undercover as Gary Rodgers, a seasonal employee. GSI Commerce provides e-commerce and interactive marketing services for retailers. The Company has 5,000 regular employees but during the holiday peak season the numbers increase to 10,000.

His first day as a seasonal employee was spent working at the Company’s fulfillment center loading a trailer with Rochelle, another seasonal employee, who had three weeks’ experience. Matt was the floor supervisor and his only guidance was to tell both employees to stack the boxes “high and tight.” Rochelle worked quickly but the two of them did a terrible job of loading a trailer. The boxes were in disarray and some were falling as they were being loaded. The Company’s failure to train either employee on how to load and stack boxes could have been disastrous. Either employee could have sustained an injury, the unbalanced load could have affected the driver’s ability to properly steer the vehicle, and it most certainly would have resulted in crushing a few boxes.

Nothing was ever mentioned about the need for training or the lack of supervision. At the end of the show, Michael rewarded Rochelle for being a hard worker, which she was, but the supervisor and all of management failed.

The lesson learned is that most jobs, in this case loading a trailer, require training and nothing should be taken for granted. This is a job that is not only physically demanding but the consequences of loading a trailer poorly will affect the employees, the truck driver, others on the highway and the customers. Michael only recognized that it was a physically exhausting job. He did not even think about the financial repercussions of not properly training employees –workers compensation claims, damaged goods, and a potentially dangerous vehicle on the highway. Could Michael have been pennywise and pound foolish for not spending money on properly training employees?

Michael’s other major experience occurred at the Company’s call center in Florida. He assisted operators who receive calls from disgruntled customers. One of the operators, Danielle, had an extremely poor attitude. She explained to Michael that you had to show the customer who was the boss. Danielle demonstrated this in dealing with a customer who was dissatisfied with the merchandise received in a crushed box. Danielle told the customer that she could not receive $50 credit immediately, because the system would not allow it to happen. The customer did not accept Danielle’s answer and Michael was so mad at Danielle that he almost blew his cover. He thought that she was not satisfying the customer and he would have fired her on the spot if the cameras were not present.

There are several problems with this situation and they don’t only center on Danielle. First, based on what little we know, Danielle was a bad hire as her personality was a poor fit for the job. Second, what kind of training had she received? At the end of the show we find that she was only provided with two days of customer service training. In a customer oriented position, we doubt that this was enough to handle calls from disgruntled customers, which are the most challenging. Third, as is often the case, the system designed to fix the problem, was, in fact, the major cause of the problem. It prevented Danielle from immediately satisfying the customer. Fourth, Michael wanted to fire her on the spot. Instead of hearing her side of the story, understanding the system’s short comings or evaluating the training process, he was ready to attack the person. A good manager should never fire a person on the spot. Before any discipline occurs he should have invested what led to this serious failure in performance.

This episode concludes, as have the others, with the CEO “taking care” of the individuals with whom he came in contact. Cameron, a warehouse picker, was promoted because Michael thought he would be a good supervisor. Adam, a call center employee, was given $10,000 so that he could have a nice wedding. Shannon, a line processor, was given $5,000 for the community football league. Is Michael’s way of fixing problems, with money, really the right way to motivate a work force? What if you were an employee of Michael’s company, working as hard as possible, and you found out on television that Michael rewarded a few select employees with cash? How would you feel?

These were all very nice gestures, but how does Michael’s actions affect the other employees in the organization? Of the 10,000 other great regular and seasonal employees many of them have needs or desires, but they will not receive similar rewards. This type of favoritism from the CEO causes far more organizational problems than it is worth. A sincere thank you from the CEO is better for the overall organizational well being than choosing a few lucky employees who not only benefit from celebrity status but also receive money and/or promotions.

“Uncovering the Undercover Boss” is written by Richard Reinhardt, Vice President of F&H Solutions Group LLC. You may contact Richard by email at rreinhardt@fhsolutionsgroup.com or by phone at 901.291.1546.

6 comments:

  1. Hi, this is Danielle. I think that you are not informed well at all on what happened with the call, and how Mr Rubin handled things. The entire call was not played. I am from a collections background. I agree that he should not have wanted to fire me on the spot, and he did not take the time to know me, and what was going on. I did lack complete training, but had been with the company in customer service in sales for about 4 months at the time, with a great customer service record. I was moved into escalations a couple weeks prior to taping, and was not aware that we had the ability to create credits, and was not advised of it during the call with the chat feature. I was not fired, or released from duty due to the issue you saw on tv. I was with the company until 2nd week of March. I did demote myself in January back to the customer sales and service, where I maintained 100% grades on my calls. There was no retraining provided as stated either.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for your response. I think we agreed on everything that I saw as a viewer. That is, he should not have wanted to fire you on the spot, you did not get complete training, and they clearly had not shown you how to use the system to create credits.
    Good luck in your future endeavors.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Good observations. It is surprising (somewhat) that the company put as little focus on training people in those tasks which are so close to their end customer. Loading a truck may not be brain surgery, but it certainly has an effect on the quality of goods delivered.

    I would imagine GSI churns serveral packers during peak if their window from "welcome" to "you aren't working out" is less than 8 hours. A wise person once said be slow to hire and quick to fire, but I don't think he meant that fast.

    It does seem that if ultimate customer satisfaction is the goal, that the "escalations" department of the call center would have the tools and authority to satisfy the customers' needs.

    Danielle's reply to your blog makes me a little less skeptical of the program. Plus it makes you a rock-star, Richard. I thought you and I were the only ones left reading this.

    ReplyDelete
  4. thanks for writing. We do get a few others who read the blog but not many comments. I need to upset more of the people who are in the show. I actually thought I was supporting Danielle, but I dont think she interpreted that way.

    ReplyDelete
  5. He was very cheap with his gifts -

    ReplyDelete
  6. I do not like the show because it has unreal expectations. Every company highlighted needed a training coordinator. You cannot expect an employee to train you to take their job. Unrealistic and not a high expectation of good end results.

    ReplyDelete